The rapid digitalization of work—driven by advances in information and communication technologies, remote and hybrid work arrangements, and GenAI-enabled systems—has fundamentally reshaped the boundaries between work and family domains. While digital tools provide unprecedented flexibility and autonomy, they also blur temporal and spatial boundaries, intensify role demands, and generate new forms of work–family conflict. This transformation is especially salient in knowledge-intensive and digitally-mediated work contexts, where the 'always-on' culture may foster constant connectivity, hinder psychological detachment, and undermine employee well-being and family functioning. At the same time, digitalization presents important opportunities for work–family enrichment. Flexible work arrangements and hybrid models can enhance individuals' capacity to integrate work and family roles, consistent with resource-based perspectives on the work–home interface. However, these benefits are not evenly distributed. Emerging evidence suggests that technostress, digital surveillance, and inequalities in access to flexible work may exacerbate existing disparities, particularly along gender and occupational lines. As digital work continues to expand, the absence of effective strategies for managing work–family boundaries may normalize excessive work intrusions into family life, ultimately challenging the sustainability of modern work systems.
Furthermore, the recent wave of return-to-office mandates by major organizations and governments worldwide has reignited debates about the contested value of flexible work, underscoring the need for rigorous research on how policy reversals affect employees' boundary management strategies and family well-being. At the same time, the mainstreaming of GenAI in everyday work introduces qualitatively new challenges—including cognitive offloading, accelerated work pace, and algorithmic task allocation—that may reshape work–family boundaries in ways not yet captured by existing theoretical frameworks. We also encourage research adopting dyadic and family-systems perspectives that examine how digital work demands cross over between partners and spill over to other family members, particularly in dual-earner and dual-career households.
By foregrounding the challenges and strategies associated with the digital work–family interface, this Special Issue seeks to advance timely and evidence-based insights into how individuals and organizations can navigate increasingly blurred boundaries between work and family domains. We encourage authors to clearly articulate the theoretical contributions of their work (e.g., extending boundary theory, role theory, work–home resources model, or socio-technical systems perspectives) and to highlight practical implications for organizations, policymakers, and employees. Papers offering cross-disciplinary perspectives or comparative insights—such as examining digital work–family dynamics across cultural or institutional contexts—are particularly welcome. Ultimately, this Special Issue seeks to catalyze a rigorous academic conversation that will help organizations and employees proactively navigate the opportunities and challenges of digital work—ensuring that technological advancements support sustainable well-being and effective work–family integration rather than undermine them.