<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
    <channel>
        <title>hubecall | Tag : institutional fragility</title>
        <link>https://hubecall.com/tag/institutional-fragility</link>
        <description>Derniers appels à publications avec le tag 'institutional fragility'.</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 04:31:21 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        <docs>https://validator.w3.org/feed/docs/rss2.html</docs>
        <generator>https://github.com/jpmonette/feed</generator>
        <language>fr</language>
        
        <copyright>hubecall © 2026</copyright>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[The Institutional Fragility of Inclusion in Contemporary HRM Systems]]></title>
            <link>https://hubecall.com/call/tandf-the-institutional-fragility-of-inclusion-in-contemporary-hrm-systems</link>
            <guid>tandf-the-institutional-fragility-of-inclusion-in-contemporary-hrm-systems</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 00:55:16 GMT</pubDate>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
    
        
        <p><strong>Benjamin Laker</strong>, Henley Business School, University of Reading</p>
        
        <p><strong>Sven Horak</strong>, St. John&#39;s University</p>
        
        <p><strong>Toyin Ajibade Adisa</strong>, Royal Docks School of Business and Law, University of East London</p>
        
        <p><strong>Fulya Acikgoz</strong>, University of Sussex Business School</p>
        
    
    
    <p>Inclusion has become a defining aspiration in modern human resource management. It is embedded in recruitment policies, leadership development strategies, employee engagement programmes, and organisational values. Yet, the institutional standing of inclusion is increasingly precarious. Across sectors and geographies, political retrenchment, economic turbulence, organisational ambivalence, and cultural contestation have converged to destabilise the norms and mechanisms that once sustained inclusive HRM.</p>
    
    <p>This special issue examines the institutional fragility of inclusion—a condition in which inclusion is publicly endorsed but inconsistently enacted, weakly governed, or symbolically maintained in the absence of substantive commitment. In this context, we ask: What becomes of workplace inclusion when its institutional scaffolding weakens, but identity difference endures—embodied, politicised, and inescapable?</p>
    
    <p>We invite theoretical, empirical, and methodological contributions that investigate how identity is constructed, contested, and regulated through HRM systems under conditions of institutional uncertainty. We encourage authors to move beyond static, categorical approaches to identity and instead theorise inclusion as a dynamic process shaped by power, legitimacy, and resistance. This includes examining how HRM practices—such as recruitment, development, performance management, and reward—reify dominant norms, marginalise difference, or function as sites of identity negotiation and contestation.</p>
    
    <p>Contributions grounded in intersectionality and social identity theory are especially welcome, as are those drawing on critical race, feminist, or postcolonial perspectives. We particularly encourage comparative and globally informed studies that examine how inclusion is refracted through diverse institutional logics, legal regimes, and cultural contexts.</p>
    
    
    <h2>Potential topics</h2>
    <ul>
        
        <li>Organisational responses to the erosion or contestation of inclusion mandates</li>
        
        <li>Identity construction, negotiation, and resistance within HRM systems</li>
        
        <li>Symbolic inclusion vs substantive change in HRM practice and policy</li>
        
        <li>How performance systems, leadership pipelines, or &#39;culture fit&#39; criteria embed normative assumptions about who belongs</li>
        
        <li>Comparative and global analyses of inclusion across varied institutional, legal, and cultural settings</li>
        
        <li>HRM as a mechanism of voice suppression, identity masking, or strategic silence</li>
        
        <li>The effects of intersectional identity configurations (e.g. gender × race × class) on access to opportunity, recognition, and legitimacy in HRM</li>
        
        <li>How informal networks and shadow structures sustain or subvert inclusion efforts</li>
        
        <li>Experiences of inclusion and exclusion when organisations retreat from formal DEI commitments</li>
        
        <li>Institutional logics, power asymmetries, and the politics of belonging in HRM systems</li>
        
        <li>Decolonial or Indigenous critiques of Western-centric inclusion frameworks in global HRM</li>
        
    </ul>
    
    
    <h2>Timeline</h2>
    <ul>
        
        <li>November 30, 2026: Manuscript deadline</li>
        
    </ul>
    
    
</div>]]></content:encoded>
            <author>The International Journal of Human Resource Management (TANDF)</author>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>